stickyvicky wrote:So you are saying "tow the party line" no matter what? Go against your own heart and all the voices inside you? Betray your own feelings? I couldn't do it. I understand loyalty and applaud it loudly BUT the one person I have to be true to is myself and my own morals. I am the one who has to live with myself and look myself in the mirror. If I was a republican (I'm not) I would not support Donald Trump. I think he is dangerous, with his fingers on the trigger God only knows what would happen, he is far too reactionary and far too egotistical to make good decisions. He thinks he know more than the Generals about ISIS? How? How is that possible? Was he there? Does he have access to classified information? How in the world can he know more than the Army Generals and FBI and other high ranking officials about any foreign affairs? He knows NOTHING about it at all. And his only advisors are his children who know even less about it than he does!
On the other hand Hillary and Bill are as crooked as they come. Deceitful liars who smile in your face as they are stabbing you in the back while pocketing millions, supposedly feeding the hungry who are just as starving now as they were, some places are actually worse off now than before they were touched by the "Clinton Foundation". It's a sad sad state of affairs..... I have never seen it this bad. They will sell our planet earth to the likes of Monsanto, and we will all die of cancer as long as it lines their pockets.
The only good thing I could say about Trump is that he may have good instincts and even though he is a megalomaniac (a delusional mental disorder that is marked by feelings of personal omnipotence and grandeur) I would trust his intentions more than Hillary's. I think he may care about our country more than she does. (Hillary cares about Hillary first and foremost). What a dilema. Yes it will come down to voting for the lessor of two evils... but I think Hillary is going to win and she may be the worst of the two. But at least the dems are friendlier towards porn. Maybe if the world can survive her for 4 years a better candidate will come along in 2020.
Sorry for the rant!
Now this is a fascinating diatribe. It epitomizes my impression of a "rational" democrat, i.e. a dissociative type (Not schizophrenic which ppl use erroneously to describe two opposite personalities)incapable of deciding between two evils and ascribing the best to the candidate they love the least. As to Trump"knowing more than the generals" about ISIS, let me "splain". Trump is well aware of ISIS's ideology. It is the ideology which is the etiology of their barbarity. Islam has yet to undergo a reformation and is a savage remnant of the dark ages of history. The "generals" you feel are so knowledgeable ascribe Islam's savagery to the consequences of poverty. All they need, as the infamous Harf once said, are "jobs". Do you think a job fare will dissuade ISIS!?
As to Trump's "megalomania",he has beaten the NY real estate market (the most difficult in the world), built a multi-million dollar empire, fathered three outstanding children, married a super model and won the republican candidacy for the presidency of the United States on his first try. I would love to be called meglomaniacal. Maybe we should have more megalomaniacs.
As to porn, I have not heard nor am I aware of any comment made that Mr. Trump would be antithetical to the porn industry. If past performance is any indication of future behavior I would say the contrary would be so, e.g. he was almost a regular on the Stern show - hardly a fundamentalist's show.
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.
