WIKIPEDIA --- HELP --- TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE

[rokkerr]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... n/Sara_Jay

The racist anti porn bastards at Wikipedia have deleted Sara Jay's page AGAIN.
The claim is ''she is not notable''. It is an uphill battle because I am fighting people who don't want pornstars on Wikipedia and simply type ''delete''. If enough people type ''delete'' away the page goes...

Can one or two of you

1. Create a log in user? (top right corner)

2. Then click ''edit'' button next to the words "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Jay"

3. Put in the following... at the bottom of the page
*'''Keep''' Sara Jay is ___________________

4. Then sign it by clicking THIS button ~~~~

... and submit. If you need help PM me.. thanks. The more information and reasons you put the better. We are going down, but not without a fight.

[WalterB]

Done and done!

[rokkerr]

Done and done!

Thanks Walt. For future posters.. .do not put in friend etc. They want supposedly impartial votes even though they are all impartial assholes.

[CGYMike]

Just added my '''keep'''on your page Dave..right below Walt

Thanks
Mike

[rokkerr]

Just added my '''keep'''on your page Dave..right below Walt

Thanks
Mike

Thanks Mike... you forgot to sign it though by pressing the squilly button...
It's important it be a logged in vote.

[Anthony_JK]

And here's what I just posted there:

ADDENDUM: Upon reading Rokkerr's note about impartiality, just modified the last sentence to read "maybe just a slight hint of racism..."; though, I still think it's a hell of a lot more than just a hint due to Sara being prolific in interracial (and probably also the "no anal" thing as well).

[Anthony_JK]

BTW...I also love the fact that when Vicky dropped in a comment supporting Sara, one of those opposing Sara promptly dropped a "sockpuppet" investigation complaint against Vicky. Riiiiight, spite has nothing to do with this.

[rokkerr]

I really think these people are porn haters. They don't know or understand adult, have no clue what award is what.
There is plenty of crap on Wikipedia, but Sara deserves her own page.

[WalterB]

Done and done!

Thanks Walt. For future posters.. .do not put in friend etc. They want supposedly impartial votes even though they are all impartial assholes.

As a personal friend, I think I have a better feel than those who do not know her and simply choose to snipe at someone because of some personal problem in their own lives. But I understand what you say. I just don't believe the naysayers are "impartial." Why? Because the reasoning presented reflects personal opinions, not impartial views.;

[carl goldfinger]

Oh WOW! WTF?

This is the german SaraJay Wikipedia site... looks "normal" to me...

This is the spanish SaraJay Wkipedia site... looks "normal" as well...

Thus, is that an american who jumped on Sara, to delete the site of one of the most well known Pornstars?
BTW... 415,875 followers on twitter isn't notable? That's more than some Mainstream stars have...

Bastard...

I just left my comment, Rokkerr (I hope it helps)



Carl

[rokkerr]

They unfortunately do not count twitter followers. You guys would not believe the BS rules they have...

[wshandcock]

Done , Sorry for the delays in getting it posted was working most of the night

Michael

[Anthony_JK]

I just went through the "sockpuppet" complaint they filed against Vicky...turns out they used an old complaint from 2012 that Vicky had made against one of the very same 'editors' whom had attempted to censor Vicky's Wiki page back then, then compared it to the post filed against Sara's current page. Yeah, someone over there has waaaay too much time and way too much power.

BTW..whatever happened to that "Vickypedia" project?? Maybe the VNA should start one of our own?

[WalterB]

Vickypedia? I don't know what that would entail but I like the sound of the basic idea. Whatcha got in mind, Anthony?

[dave45]

well I think I got it there


Dave

[rokkerr]

LOL cracking up at the VNA Wikipedia Army....

... they are gonna hate our guts over there... :)

[WalterB]

Just a hint, folks. When you make an entry, first click the "star" (*) and three single quotes (''') not double quotes ("""). That way, the "Keep" will show up like the others. Then 3 single quotes after the word "keep".

[WalterB]

Too bad we can't get 20 or 30 more folks to comment, Rokkerr.

[rokkerr]

Too bad we can't get 20 or 30 more folks to comment, Rokkerr.

I think we could have 50 and they will still delete it...
They really have a strange group of editors...

Why do we care you ask?

Wikipedia is one of the FIRST things that people look at when they Google someone and it gets girls a lot of traffic. There is nothing wrong for someone to look at Wikipedia which is NOT blocked to surfers unlike a lot of porn sites.

[Anthony_JK]

Wouldn't matter anyway, because they would still dismiss us all as "sockpuppets".

Personally, I think that Vicky and Rokkerr should tell Wikipedia to go straight to hell, and produce their own project, or have The Real Porn Wikileaks develop their own porn database page. They may provide for quick hits, but at what costs when they are such assholes about it??