latest review

Don't just read, reply! Start your own threads, don't be shy, likeminded people may appreciate your thoughts! Talk about anything VNA related or not!
Post Reply
User avatar
stickyvicky
Commander in briefs
Posts: 26473
Joined: March 25th, 2005, 8:41 am
Location: Southwest Florida
Contact:

April 17th, 2007, 11:11 pm

by Adultreviews.net out of denmark I think? check it out, pretty nice review, although he hates the control panel, every review lately is good, but they all complain about the design, too simple... what's wrong with simple? Isn't the tits and ass the most important thing? Good content? How should we do the design better? I know one thing for sure when I have time I'll redo all the old galleries from 2004, in the beginning I was experimenting to see what layout everyone liked best, so they are inconsistent... damnit....

http://www.adultreviews.net/review/matu ... index.html
User avatar
WalterB
Special Forces Commander (General, 4-Star)
Posts: 31033
Joined: December 31st, 2005, 10:42 pm
Location: El Paso, Texas
Contact:

April 17th, 2007, 11:32 pm

Personally I thought his review was a little 'iffy.' A good review, to be sure, but is this just one guy who makes his money by surfing porn sites and writing about his preferences?

Yes, Vicky, overall it was a good review, and I also did think he brought up a couple good points. Maybe you could put some kind of comment on the front page that "this is a work in progress. You will see my original postings and my 'today' postings, and how they have evolved." I don't know, something to explain the different thumbnail sizes and other differences.
To go back and try to bring everything up to what you do today would be a massive project. I have a few ideas myself, but I think this subject would require a lot of thought and discussion. Sit down with a piece of paper, put a chastity belt on Rokkerr, and have a discussion. List all the comments that people have made and try to come up with a central theme. Not easy, I'm sure. Personally, I like it the way it is. Sure, there are differences, but, for one thing, it shows that you are active in updating and formatting the site. Maybe divide the site into "years," one section of things posted in 2004, one for 2005, one for 2006 - hell, I don't know. I have no imagination.

Bottom line? I like your site. I think it has everything I need.
User avatar
John_fromNY
Major General (2-Star)
Posts: 7534
Joined: February 3rd, 2007, 8:54 pm
Location: New York

April 18th, 2007, 12:33 am

WalterB wrote:Personally I thought his review was a little 'iffy.' A good review, to be sure, but is this just one guy who makes his money by surfing porn sites and writing about his preferences?...
Take what I write below, tongue and cheek . Is there a chuckle, in you, dying to get out?

Who is Mephistopheles? One of the Lucifer's henchmen? Spawn of Hell... Is this guy a Todd McFarland fan? As he's the author of Spawn. Talk about "Sympathy for the Devil" -- A big smile!!!!

Walter's right -- I could do this too, if I wasn't working....Heehee!!! I betcha he's one of these guys who steals passwords and usernames during the day too.

Anyway, a lot of the sites listed at this AdultReviews website are geared just toward video voyeurs. I counted a few sites listed from the BangBros.com network. A few from the BigTit Patrol network and I believe a few others from the Primecups.com network. And PornAccess.com out of Cyprus. This site also lists two sites that have two famous photographers, amazingly both from Penthouse, J. Stephen Hicks (Digital Dreamgirls) and Suzanne Randall (Suze.net)

I'm surprised they don't have Ken Marcus' site listed. As that is some sick demented stuff. Bondage and S & M. Did I get off on a tangent again?

And talk about twisted.... About his review he says "One thing I love about this site is the Amateur content (without Vicky!). There's about 25 videos in this section and this stuff is extremly hot and very 'real'. In many cases, it appears as if the people in the videos are too engrossed in the moment to even be aware of the cameras. When I say 'real' I mean it. In one video a very sexy babe has sex with an obese, older guy who looks like he'd never get this level of pussy if he weren't in porn. When she tries to start giving him a blowjob, there are several instances where she has to pick lint/dirt off his dick and her tongue. I don't know what it is, but there's something about seeing a stunning babe have sex with a total slob that turns me on. It almost reminds me of beastiality!" ...

This guy is definitely twisted... I think his scrotum is twisted too tight.... ouch!!!!!....

"There was also a great video of three girls lying on a bed and masturbating, making out, and going down on each other that REALLY turned me on. They seemed so nervous, horny, and most importantly - they looked like REAL girls."

He must be into the blow up variety - right Spawn from Hell?

When you give Rachel Aziani's site an 8.5 and don't even rate Kelly Madison's site in the top 50 something is definitely wrong, right Spawn from Hell??

Vicky - he does like your video area, and you can fix your picture galleries so that they can be upgraded to bigger sizes. But why please this asshole?? As apparently he can't navigate through your website to save his soul .... Heeheeee!!! A really big smile!!!

... Overall, piss this guy off and give the review a good flushing...right down the toilet!!!!
Post Reply