http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/06/ ... 3816.shtml
Why does the government have to get involved? The adult industry it seems to me has done quite well regulating itself the last decade or so.
What do you guys think?
Discuss!
![feedbackplease :feedbackplease:](./images/smilies/feedbackplease.gif)
Really? See Glove try to wipe out Love...st1fler wrote:no glove no love!!!
but not in porn lol
If it's Stormy Daniels or Kirsten Price or Alektra Blue or Jessica Drake over at Wicked. I get into these ladies not the guy wearing the prophylactics. It's more about seeing the enjoyment that Stormy, Kirsten, Alektra or Jessica have on their faces. Remember, they have to do all the work here. All the guy does is sit back and relax.stickyvicky wrote:Like everything, it's all about money. Guys don't rent or buy porn with condoms in it, or at least not nearly as much. It ruins the fantasy for them, or so I'm told....
stickyvicky wrote: ....It's supposed to be spur of the moment, impulsive sex with your babysitter or secretary right? Not planned out, not, yes honey i remembered the condoms. I personally don't like watching porn with condoms, even though some of them are see through, light pink ones, I just think it's unattractive, that little roll at the bottom, it's not supposed to be there... it does bring reality into the equation.
The problem is, if they force the American industry to go condom only, then all the business will go to the Europeans and Brazilians and everywhere else they make condomless porn. They will kill the business here, but supply will still rise up to meet demand. Plus condoms break and they hurt. A normal couple fucks for 7 minutes before ejaculation. A porn couple making a movie might fuck for an hour or two or even three to get the positions the director wants. The condom dries out, it causes redness, swelling, chafing, it's horrible. You probably go through 5 of them during the scene. And don't even talk about condoms for anal it's worse. As a performer, I hated them. The safest way is for everyone to have 2 week testing, not 4 week testing. But again it's a money issue, no one wants to pay for that. When I was shooting for commercial studios I insisted on fresh tests, (< 14 days) it was my rule, so they had to hire guys with fresh tests, or the guy they wanted would go get retested. I never had anyone question me on it, they all complied willingly.
Do you know, they even can test on the spot now. The production company can just use swabs inside the cheek and test for hiv and have results in 5 min. That would be the 100% safest way. Even better than a 2 week old test. But again, it's the money and responsibility part of it.
h0rnytoad1 wrote:without taking sides, they must think its gonna catch on if they put it in the movies ?
like a trend or something, lol
i think its a political thing, they must think condom usage in porn will influence kids to use them in real life.
when you buy a movie, you never hear about the safe practices that go on behind the scenes, the testing, the checking stuff like that.
But condoms, you can see them in the movie. They're just trying to influence the viewers to be more responsible to stop spreading STDs among the population. Same thing in school.
Nothing wrong with wanting people to be safer and responsible.
problem is its forcing already responsible viewers to not have the choice when watching the movie, all they will have for choice is "with" condom. that's the real problem.
allot of movies i've seen have condoms. more don't have them. its really up to the director and producers if they want to send a message, whatever it may be.
be safe wear condoms. or be responsible and get tested.
truth is, STD testing should be a once a year thing atleast, like a pap smear or that butt thing the doctor does to guys.
that alone would get ppl to become more responsible.
Posth0rnytoad1 wrote:i was talking about how porn influences kids, the bigger picture, think teens like to do stuff by coincidence? think they know to get tested every month?
Nonsense my ass. kids are curious, and by kids i mean teens. They'll either learn by watching other kids make-out and have parties or on the street or the internet.John_fromNY wrote:But the child's parents should be restricting all types of access to these sites in the first place.
This post of yours has been reported.h0rnytoad1 wrote:Nonsense my ass. kids are curious, and by kids i mean teens. They'll either learn by watching other kids make-out and have parties or on the street or the internet.John_fromNY wrote:But the child's parents should be restricting all types of access to these sites in the first place.
right, how many parents you know actually "control" their teens? i mean for real. lol
You seem to be living in a fantasy world where everybody "should" do this or "should" do that.
monkey see monkey do John, monkey see monkey do.
The way i see it, have a condom in your pocket, know when to use it.
where's the rudeness in that post buddy?John_fromNY wrote:I see that you are rude and insulting, once again HT.
No one can state a comment contrary to the way you're thinking.
You think you rule this board. That you are above everyone here. Well you're not.
Get over it man.
I'm glad I've stayed away. And I will stay away, until you're long gone.
Well I'm not laughing. This second post and your PM have also been reported.h0rnytoad1 wrote:where's the rudeness in that post buddy?John_fromNY wrote:I see that you are rude and insulting, once again HT.
No one can state a comment contrary to the way you're thinking.
You think you rule this board. That you are above everyone here. Well you're not.
Get over it man.
I'm glad I've stayed away. And I will stay away, until you're long gone.
and where does it say you have to think like me?
i was actually thinking the same thing about your post above mine.
lol
Well too bad we can't have a normal discussion. Frankly i don't care about this topic like you seem to, i'm just voicing my opinion.
its still allowed in here, isn't it John?
hey i tried to talk to you, but if you don't want to, oh well.John_fromNY wrote:Well I'm not laughing. This second post and your PM have also been reported.